Key facts at a glance
SG foreigner mandatory savings
0%
CPF is Citizen/PR only
HK foreigner mandatory savings
5% MPF
Applies past 13 months on a work visa
Effective rate at S$120k-equivalent
6.6% vs 13.6%
Singapore EP vs Hong Kong, worked example
Here's the short version: for a foreign tech or finance employee, not a citizen of either place, Singapore's take-home mechanics generally come out ahead of Hong Kong's. At a S$120,000-equivalent salary, an Employment Pass holder in Singapore keeps roughly 93.4% of gross (effective deduction rate 6.6%), while a comparable foreign hire in Hong Kong keeps roughly 86.4% (effective rate 13.6%). The gap isn't about income tax bands, it's almost entirely about mandatory savings schemes.
CPF, Singapore's compulsory savings scheme, simply doesn't apply to Employment Pass or S Pass holders: 0%, full stop. Hong Kong's MPF (Mandatory Provident Fund) is different: it applies to most foreign employees too, once a work visa runs past 13 months, which covers the overwhelming majority of standard expat contracts. That single structural difference, not the headline tax rates, is the real story of this comparison.
Run your own salary through both calculators side by side.
Open the Singapore calculatorHow each system actually deducts from your pay
Singapore runs a single progressive Income Tax scale, from IRAS, 0% up to 24% across 13 bands, applied to chargeable income (gross salary less any CPF contribution). For an Employment Pass or S Pass holder, that's the entire deduction. There's no mandatory savings scheme layered on top, because CPF is scoped to Citizens and Permanent Residents only.
Hong Kong runs two parallel Salaries Tax calculations and charges whichever is lower, a mechanism the Inland Revenue Department (IRD) applies automatically: the progressive bands (2%, 6%, 10%, 14%, then 17% on the remainder, each band HK$50,000 wide, applied after a basic personal allowance) or the standard rate (15% on the first HK$5 million of net income before allowances, 16% above that). On top of whichever tax figure wins, most employees also pay MPF, 5% of relevant income up to a HK$30,000/month ceiling (capping the annual employee contribution at HK$18,000), and MPF applies to foreign employees too, once their work visa passes the 13-month exemption threshold.
Singapore vs Hong Kong: the deduction structure
| Deduction | Singapore | Hong Kong |
|---|---|---|
| Personal tax authority | IRAS, progressive resident rates (0%–24%) | IRD, lower of progressive (2%–17%) or standard (15%/16%) |
| Mandatory savings scheme | CPF, employee 20% (age ≤55) | MPF, employee 5% |
| Applies to foreign employees? | No, Citizens/PRs only | Yes, most work-visa holders after 13 months |
| Mandatory savings ceiling | S$8,000/month Ordinary Wages | HK$30,000/month relevant income |
Worked comparison: three salary points, expat status in both
Roughly comparable local-currency salaries (using an approximate SGD/HKD rate near 6.05, mid-2026), run through both engines for a foreign employee: Employment Pass status in Singapore, and a foreign hire past the 13-month MPF exemption in Hong Kong.
| Salary (SG / HK) | SG net/yr | SG eff. rate | HK net/yr | HK eff. rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S$80,000 / HK$500,000 | S$76,650 | 4.2% | HK$440,500 | 11.9% |
| S$120,000 / HK$750,000 | S$112,050 | 6.6% | HK$648,000 | 13.6% |
| S$180,000 / HK$1,100,000 | S$162,450 | 9.8% | HK$938,500 | 14.7% |
Singapore figures: IRAS YA2026 resident tax bands, 0% CPF (Employment Pass). Hong Kong figures: IRD 2025/26 progressive Salaries Tax (the lower of progressive vs standard for these income levels), plus 5% MPF up to the HK$18,000/year cap. See the full breakdowns on the Singapore Salary Calculator and Hong Kong Salary Calculator.
Don't assume MPF is optional as a foreigner
A mistake we see often: candidates comparing offers assume Hong Kong works like Singapore, that mandatory savings only apply to locals. It doesn't. MPF exemption in Hong Kong is duration-based, not citizenship-based, tied to Section 11 of the Immigration Ordinance: a work visa of 13 months or less is exempt, or you're already covered by an overseas retirement scheme. Any standard multi-year expat contract, which is most of them, crosses that threshold, and the employer must enrol you within 60 days of the exemption ending. Budget for the 5% MPF deduction on a Hong Kong offer unless your contract genuinely runs under 13 months.
This is take-home mechanics only, not the full lifestyle picture
Singapore's take-home edge for expats is real and structural, but this comparison deliberately stops at payroll mechanics: tax bands, CPF versus MPF, effective deduction rates. Housing costs, school fees, healthcare, and general cost of living differ substantially between the two cities, and a higher net salary in one can still buy noticeably less housing than a lower net salary in the other. Treat this article as the tax and mandatory-savings half of the decision, and research cost of living separately before choosing between offers.
Compare your own Singapore and Hong Kong offers
Enter each salary into its calculator to see your exact net pay, side by side.
Monthly briefing
Get our monthly salary and market update
Salary movements, contractor rate changes, tax updates, and new tools. Sent once a month, no noise.
No spam. Unsubscribe any time. GDPR-compliant.
Frequently asked questions
Which pays more, Singapore or Hong Kong, for a foreign employee?
For an expat on an Employment Pass in Singapore versus a comparable foreign hire in Hong Kong, Singapore's take-home mechanics come out ahead at every salary point we tested, mainly because CPF simply doesn't apply to foreigners (0% deduction beyond Income Tax), while Hong Kong's MPF does apply to most foreign employees after 13 months on a work visa. At S$120,000/HK$750,000-equivalent gross, an EP holder keeps an effective rate of 6.6% versus roughly 13.6% for a comparable Hong Kong hire once MPF and Salaries Tax are combined.
Does MPF really apply to foreign employees in Hong Kong?
Yes, for most of them. Foreign employees on a Hong Kong employment visa are exempt from MPF only if their stay is 13 months or less, or if they're already covered by an overseas retirement scheme. Once a work visa is extended past 13 months, which covers the overwhelming majority of expats on a standard multi-year contract, the employer must enrol them in an MPF scheme within 60 days. This is the single biggest structural difference from Singapore's CPF, which is citizen/PR-only regardless of how long a foreigner stays.
Why is CPF citizen/PR-only in Singapore but MPF applies to most Hong Kong foreigners?
The two schemes were built on different eligibility philosophies. CPF is explicitly scoped to people whose long-term working lives are anchored in Singapore, Citizens and PRs, so a foreigner on a work pass never triggers it no matter how long they stay. MPF's exemption is duration-based rather than citizenship-based: a short posting under 13 months is exempt, but a standard multi-year expat contract in Hong Kong crosses that threshold and MPF kicks in for almost anyone, foreign or local.
How does Hong Kong's 'two-rate' tax system work, and does it matter for this comparison?
Hong Kong runs your Salaries Tax two ways and charges you whichever is lower: the progressive bands (2% to 17% across HK$50,000-wide bands after allowances) or the flat standard rate (15% on the first HK$5 million of net income before allowances, 16% above that). For most tech and finance salaries, the progressive calculation comes out lower and is what actually applies, which is what the worked table below uses. It's a genuinely different mechanism from Singapore's single progressive scale, but the net effect for typical salaries is a similar-shaped bill, just added to a mandatory MPF deduction that a Singapore Employment Pass holder doesn't have.
Is this comparison accurate if I'm converting SGD to HKD, or should I use my home currency?
Treat the SGD and HKD figures in the worked table as separate local-currency salaries chosen to be roughly comparable (using an approximate SGD/HKD rate around 6.05, current as of mid-2026), not as a precise currency conversion of one identical offer. The Hong Kong dollar is pegged to the US dollar under the HKMA's Linked Exchange Rate System, while the Singapore dollar floats, so the SGD/HKD rate moves with USD/SGD over time. Always re-check the live rate and compare your two actual offer letters, not this table alone, before making a decision.
Does this comparison include cost of living or lifestyle differences?
No, deliberately not. This article compares take-home mechanics only: tax bands, CPF versus MPF, and effective deduction rates. Housing costs, school fees, healthcare, and general cost of living differ substantially between Singapore and Hong Kong and would need their own dedicated comparison; a materially higher net salary in one city can still buy less housing than a lower net salary in the other, so don't treat the take-home numbers alone as the full financial picture.
Which city has the higher top marginal tax rate?
Singapore's top resident Income Tax rate is 24% (on chargeable income above S$1,000,000, YA2026), higher than Hong Kong's top progressive band of 17%, or the 15%/16% standard rate ceiling. But top marginal rate alone is misleading for most tech and finance salaries below the very top bands, since Hong Kong's MPF deduction and Singapore's CPF exemption for foreigners typically outweigh the headline tax-rate gap at realistic income levels, as the worked table shows.
Related reading & tools