Key facts at a glance
£60,000 UK, net
£45,357/yr
£3,780/month after tax & NI
Equivalent PLN revenue
PLN 25,000/mo
£1 = zł 5.08 (approximate, mid-July 2026)
Poland B2B net (ryczałt)
PLN 230,912/yr
≈£45,455/yr, near-identical
Here is the answer before the mechanics: a UK PAYE salary of £45,000 nets £35,920 a year (£2,993/month), and comfortably beats the FX-equivalent Polish B2B contractor invoicing PLN 19,000 a month, who nets the equivalent of roughly £32,983. Move up to £60,000 UK and the two paths land within about £100 of each other: £45,357 UK net versus roughly £45,455-worth on the Polish side. Push to £70,000-equivalent and Poland pulls ahead, netting roughly £54,279 against the UK's £51,157.
That crossover, right around £60,000, is the single most useful number in this comparison. Below it, stick with UK PAYE's numbers in your head. Above it, Poland's flat, low B2B tax structure starts doing real work in your favour, and the gap only widens from there.
Run your own UK figure against the Poland B2B calculator.
Open the Poland calculatorHow the comparison actually works, step by step
Start with your UK gross salary and run it through Income Tax (20%/40%/45% bands above the Personal Allowance) and National Insurance (8%/2%) to get your UK net. Convert your target monthly figure to PLN, or your UK salary to a monthly PLN-equivalent, at a current live rate, we've used £1 = zł 5.08 (approximate, mid-July 2026) throughout this article, but check a live rate before making any real decision since GBP/PLN moves day to day.
Then run the PLN monthly figure through Poland's B2B mechanics, but here's the structural difference that matters: a UK salary is a fixed number your employer pays you, while a Poland B2B figure is invoiced revenue that a contractor then has to run through ZUS social insurance, NFZ health insurance, and one of three chosen income tax modes (skala, liniowy, or ryczałt). This comparison uses whichever mode a real contractor would actually pick to maximise net pay, which turns out to be ryczałt at every income level shown here. See our companion piece on Poland's three B2B tax modes for why that mode wins and when it wouldn't.
UK take-home vs Poland B2B take-home, three income points
Converted at £1 = zł 5.08 (approximate, mid-July 2026). The Poland column uses ryczałt, the mode that wins at every revenue level shown here; see the companion article if your own numbers fall in a range where skala or liniowy might win instead.
| UK gross | PLN equivalent | UK net | Poland net (ryczałt) | Poland net, in £ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| £45,000 | PLN 19,000/mo | £35,920/yr (£2,993/mo) | PLN 167,552/yr (PLN 13,963/mo) | ≈£32,983/yr (≈£2,749/mo) |
| £60,000 | PLN 25,000/mo | £45,357/yr (£3,780/mo) | PLN 230,912/yr (PLN 19,243/mo) | ≈£45,455/yr (≈£3,788/mo) |
| £70,000 | PLN 30,000/mo | £51,157/yr (£4,263/mo) | PLN 275,738/yr (PLN 22,978/mo) | ≈£54,279/yr (≈£4,523/mo) |
UK net figures from the UK Take-Home Calculator (2026/27 HMRC rates). Poland net figures from the Poland B2B Calculator (2026 rates, standard duży ZUS, ryczałt mode). See our full three-mode breakdown for how skala and liniowy compare at each of these revenue levels.
Two traps: the FX rate, and treating B2B revenue like a salary
This comparison is a point-in-time snapshot at £1 = zł 5.08. GBP/PLN moved from roughly zł 5.00 to zł 5.08 within the first two weeks of July 2026 alone, so re-check a live rate before treating any of these PLN figures as fixed, especially if you're negotiating a contract or planning a currency transfer for relocation costs.
The bigger trap is structural: a Poland B2B monthly revenue figure isn't a salary. It's what you invoice a client before ZUS, NFZ, and your chosen tax mode take their share, and unlike a UK salary it carries no built-in holiday pay, sick pay, or employer pension contribution. Compare net cash by all means, that's what this article does, but don't assume the two arrangements are otherwise equivalent. See our full breakdown of Poland's three B2B tax modes before treating any Polish contract offer as a straight salary substitute.
B2B contracting basics worth knowing before you compare offers
Setting up as jednoosobowa działalność gospodarcza involves registering a sole-proprietor business, choosing your tax mode for the year, and paying ZUS and NFZ monthly regardless of how much you invoice that particular month. New businesses can access a reduced preferential ZUS rate for their first 24 months, not reflected in the standard-rate figures above, which meaningfully improves early take-home. Warsaw, Kraków, and Wrocław are the three biggest hubs for this kind of contracting work, with Warsaw commanding the highest day rates but also the highest cost of living.
Cost of living, particularly Warsaw rent versus the UK, is genuinely a separate and important question, but it's out of scope for this take-home comparison. Treat the net-pay numbers above as the tax side of the equation only, and factor in your own housing and lifestyle costs separately before deciding whether a move makes sense.
Compare your own UK and Poland numbers
Run your UK salary and your Polish B2B offer side by side, and check which tax mode actually wins at your revenue.
Monthly briefing
Get our monthly salary and market update
Salary movements, contractor rate changes, tax updates, and new tools. Sent once a month, no noise.
No spam. Unsubscribe any time. GDPR-compliant.
Frequently asked questions
Is take-home pay actually higher in Poland than the UK?
It depends where you land on the income scale, and the crossover is close to a £60,000 UK-equivalent income. Below that, UK PAYE tends to net more: a £45,000 UK salary nets £35,920 a year, versus roughly £32,983-worth of net income for a Polish B2B contractor invoicing the FX-equivalent PLN 19,000 a month under ryczałt. Above roughly £60,000-equivalent, Poland's flat, low B2B tax rate pulls ahead: at a £70,000-equivalent income, the Polish contractor nets roughly £54,279-worth versus the UK's £51,157. The gap widens the higher you go, because Poland's ryczałt rate stays flat at 12% while UK Income Tax keeps climbing through 40% and 45% bands.
Why does this comparison use B2B revenue for Poland instead of a salary, and does that make it unfair?
Because that's genuinely how the two markets work, and pretending otherwise would be the unfair comparison. The overwhelming majority of Polish IT professionals invoice as B2B contractors (jednoosobowa działalność gospodarcza) rather than working as standard payroll employees (umowa o pracę), because it's tax-advantageous for both sides. A UK £60,000 PAYE salary and a Polish contractor invoicing PLN 25,000 a month aren't structurally identical, one is guaranteed employee pay with statutory holiday and sick pay built in, the other is invoiced revenue a contractor has to run through their own one-person business, choose a tax mode for, and manage themselves. This article compares the net cash each path actually delivers, using whichever Polish tax mode a real contractor would choose (ryczałt wins at every income level shown here), but the underlying employment relationships are genuinely different, not just relabelled versions of the same thing.
Why does the same PLN figure produce a different result depending on tax mode?
Because a Polish B2B contractor doesn't pay one fixed tax rate, they choose between skala podatkowa, podatek liniowy, and ryczałt for the whole tax year, and the winning mode changes with revenue. At every income level in this comparison, ryczałt (a flat 12% on revenue for software development work) comes out ahead for a typical low-cost solo contractor. See our companion piece on how Poland's three B2B tax modes actually work for the full mechanics and why the winner shifts at lower revenue levels.
Does the FX rate used here change the comparison much?
Yes, and it's worth checking a live rate before making any real decision. This comparison uses £1 = zł 5.08, the mid-July 2026 rate, but GBP/PLN moves day to day, it ranged from roughly zł 5.00 to zł 5.08 within the first two weeks of July 2026 alone. A meaningfully weaker or stronger pound shifts every PLN figure in this article proportionally, so treat these numbers as a snapshot for relative comparison, not a fixed guarantee, and re-check the live rate close to when you'd actually be negotiating a contract or transferring money.
What does a UK PAYE employee lose by becoming a Polish B2B contractor that these net figures don't show?
Quite a lot, and it's worth being honest about it. UK PAYE comes with statutory holiday pay, sick pay, an employer pension contribution, and employment protections that a Polish B2B contractor doesn't automatically get. A Polish sole proprietor has to fund their own gaps between contracts, doesn't get paid leave unless they build it into their rate, and carries the administrative overhead of invoicing, bookkeeping, and choosing (and living with) a tax mode for the year. The net-pay numbers in this article are a fair comparison of cash in hand, they are not a claim that the two arrangements are equivalent in security or benefits.
Is there a lower ZUS rate for a contractor just starting out in Poland?
Yes, and this article's figures don't use it. New Polish sole proprietors can access a preferential reduced ZUS rate for their first 24 months of business (and a ZUS-exempt period for health insurance only in the first 6 months under "ulga na start"), which meaningfully improves net pay versus the standard "duży ZUS" rate used throughout this comparison and the companion three-mode article. If you're relocating to Poland to start B2B contracting for the first time, your real take-home in year one is likely to be somewhat higher than the steady-state figures shown here, worth factoring in when comparing an early-career move.
Related reading & tools